Atari Sues over Negative Alone in the Dark Review, Accuses Reviewer of Piracy (Updated)
by Aaron Linde, Jun 20, 2008 3:03pm PDTUpdate: Gamer.nl staffer Erwin Bergervoet has informed Shacknews that Atari also asked the Dutch gaming site to pull its 5/10 review of Alone in the Dark posted Thursday, a day before the game's official European street date.
"Within an hour [after posting], Atari called to have the review pulled off, claiming there was an embargo till Friday," Bergervoet said in a comment to Shacknews. "Our review copy was sent directly to us by Atari and [was] not a pirated copy. They explicitly told [Gamer.nl] that they only let high scoring reviews break the post-release embargo date."
Original Story: Atari has filed suit against German gaming website 4Players for publishing a negative pre-release review of Alone in the Dark, alleging that it was written based on an illegally obtained copy of the game.
According to a 4Players editorial spotted by Game|Life, Atari's lawsuit claims that the publication date of the review—which scored Xbox 360 version of the game at 68%—implies that it was written based upon a pirated or preview version of the title. Consequently, Atari seeks an undisclosed amount in restitution.
The Xbox 360 version of Alone in the Dark began appearing on file sharing websites earlier this week, prior to the publication of any online reviews. However, 4Players argued in its editorial that it procured a copy through a retail connection who sold them a copy of Eden Games' horror shooter before the game's European June 20 street date.
Though Atari's suit against 4Players marks the company's first legal action regarding early reviews of the game, the company has also leveled complaints at several other European gaming sites.
Going by a Kotaku report, a 3/10 review of the game on Scandinavian games site GameReactor was pulled shortly after it hit the website. Atari accused the site of pirating the game, stating that press copies had only been sent out a day previously.
Norwegian gaming site Gamer.no also claims that it was asked to remove its 3/10 review of the title based on a copy purchased at a retailer earlier this week.
"Atari contacted us just minutes after it was published, claiming that our review is probably based on a preview or pirated copy, and requested it to be removed," said Gamer.no's Tor-Steinar Nastad Tangedal. "We never removed it, of course."
The PC, PlayStation 2, Xbox 360 and Wii editions of Alone in the Dark hit North American retailers on June 24. A PlayStation 3 version is expected this fall.
Kinect for Xbox One coming to PC
Xbox One does not provide any built-in DVR capabilities
Xbox One increases friends lists to 1,000
Xbox One achievements dynamic, not limited to single games









Comments
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 20 replies.
Well, Germans didn't like Seinfeld either.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 6 replies.
I wonder what they'll blame on piracy next?
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Seems like a bad way to go about getting the word out about the game.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 8 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
???????
How could they have pirated it?!?
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Genius.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Atari killed this game...
The knowledge that a single review is dishonest, for whatever reason, is enough to harm the integrity of all games journalism - It's only ever counterproductive to allow a bias, as in the fullness of time your readership will drop and you'll lose that livelihood due to being considered untrustworthy anyway.
*retreats ever further into the Promised Land of indie game development*
Seriously, your ability to succeed as a website hinges on your ability to have reviews out on day one if not earlier. Your ability have early reviews is dependent on receiving advance copies from the publisher. Now, your ability to get advance copies is dependent on staying in the publisher's good graces, which currently means you can't do anything to piss them off.
There's already the very real spectre that bad reviews make them less happy with you. I was astonished to see the (apparently COMMONPLACE) passive-aggressive threats taking place, where publishers "allow" good reviews to go online early, but bad reviews "must" wait. I cannot fathom how they have this degree of control over companies who are supposedly far enough out of the publisher's pocket to provide an honest review of their product, and it scares me.
Now they'll use legal pressure against bad reviews, under the already-straining-under-its-load-of-hyperbole banner of "piracy"? Bad times ahead, my friends.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
It's a franchise, so all the sites that gave GTA4 and MGS4 10/10 must be clamoring to do the same with AitD.
I've been having fun with GTA4, but it sure as hell isn't perfect. And the constant interruptions with "press X to continue" of MGS4 inspired me to put the game down after 30 minutes. Luckily my roommate bought it, since I'd be pissed if I paid that much money for it.
I know the MG fanboys are going to scream blasphemy, but I wanted to play an actual game, not cut-scenes and loading sequences.
GTA4 has shitty controls for all vehicles, multiplayer that feels tacked on, a dating/friend system that is just downright obnoxious and intrusive, tedious mini-games, and other things. It's still great fun to run around causing mayhem in it, but it surely is NOT a 10/10.
Any site giving out these scores in the face of obvious flaws is highly suspect in my eyes.
That being said, I wonder just how the North American media will score AitD in comparison to European sites.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 8 replies.
Site is accused of using a pirated version of the game for the review. The game turns out to be so bad that no one would want to pirate the game.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
http://forums.tweakguides.com/showthread.php?t=7792
According to ebgames it's not due till monday. Clearly it's being sold before it's street date. Case Closed.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
If the game sucks... well then it sucks, you should have made it better. Since, you have to have some sort of standards, if the game really sucks, I wonder how people can't notice it before it is released.
Then sued and harassed them after the review, claiming that they supposedly acquired the copy illegally (which apparently they did not as seen in some forum).
Well at least someone didn't get fired like in the gamespot case.
You can change your name, Infogrames, but your grames are still shit.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
You must be logged in to post.