UK Report Suggests Movie-like Game Ratings
by Chris Faylor, Mar 27, 2008 9:38am PDTIn a report commissioned by British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, study author and clinical psychologist Tanya Byron has suggested a number of changes to increase the effectiveness of video game violence classifications in Britain, including a more film-like rating system.
"We need to improve on the systems already in place to help parents restrict children's access to games which are not suitable for their age," she wrote.
Chief among Byron's recommendations is that the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) introduce a new 12+ rating for games. Currently, games in the UK are only required to be rated if they contain gross violence. According to Byron, "the threshold for statutory classification [of video games] is quite high and is inconsistent with that for film and DVDs."
While the BBFC would only be required to rate games 12+ or higher, Byron suggested that the Pan European Game Information (PEGI), which voluntarily rates games, focus on titles that would earn a 3+ or 7+ rating, which she claimed is "where the evidence of potential harm is weakest."
To prevent consumer confusion between BBFC and PEGI ratings, Byron recommended that BBFC logos appear on the front of game packages, while PEGI logos appear on the back of the boxes. Amidst the 220-page report, she also noted her desire to increase the awareness and understanding of game ratings in the public eye.
In response, both the BBFC and Entertainment and Leisure Software Publisher Association (ELSPA) expressed support of Byron's proposal.
"We all need to work hard to bring understanding up to the same level, and help parents and children make informed choices," said BBFC director David Cooke. "I welcome the film-style classification system and greater role for the BBFC which she recommends in paragraph 7.47 of her report."
"We fully support Dr Byron's advice to parents on the use of technology in the home and parental awareness of their children's activities, including the need for wider awareness of age ratings on video games," noted ELSPA director Paul Jackson.
"However, we are concerned that the proposals as they stand may struggle to keep up with the public's increasing desire to buy and play online," Jackson continued. "The games industry would need to be re-assured that the BBFC would be capable of delivering against any new remit, or whether PEGI may be more appropriate.
"We look forward to working very closely with Government over the next few months to address these concerns as the implications of the review are fully understood," he concluded.
Tales from Space: Mutant Blobs Attack preview
Alan Wake 2 would be 'much quicker' than first game, says Remedy
Darksiders 2 releases June 26, pre-order bonuses announced
PlayStation Home getting avatar 'fighting' game
Girl Fight bringing fighting girls to XBLA and PSN
Skyrim Workshop touts 2M downloads, 2,500 mods
Xenonauts dev promises 'proper remake' of XCOM
Binary Domain demo available this week
Shack PSA: Angry Birds on Facebook today
Resistance: Burning Skies dawns on Vita in May
Comments
It started out with the often moronic Hayes code that molded content (often with ridiculous results; if you have ever read the rules on white slavery in film you'll get the idea fast) and finally solidified into a copyright cartel/unelected morality keeper that jerry rigs the system for its' own self serving interests.
Is this a model that anyone, let alone one that the games industry, should follow?
But hey, if the people of the UK want counters placed on weapons to limit the number of deaths or minimum/maximum number of TNA cutscenes in MA games or restrictions on materials that are offensive to concerned mothers, psychologists and preachers who am I to stop them?
:Leaves Fox styled rant pulpit.:
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
Government going to make ratings more obvious for shitty parents.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.