Activision: No Interest in Take-Two Acquisition

4
Activision CEO Bobby Kotick said that Take-Two did not meet his company's criteria for a viable acquisition, GamesIndustry reports.

"We've said that we need a history of profitability, good management, the proprietary technology for a franchise, history of multimillion unit sellers," said Kotick yesterday at the Goldman Sachs Technology Investment Symposium. "Take-Two didnÂ’t fulfill those requirements. Maybe it does over the long-term for EA, but it doesn't for us."

Kotick went on to suggest that EA's recent $2 billion bid for Take-Two is a reaction to Activision's recent success, which saw the company claim the top of the US games publishing heap shortly after brokering a merger with Vivendi in early December of last year.

"You're going to start thinking about what you need to do to maintain your lead," Kotick added. "Without getting into too many of the details of Take-Two, we really like businesses where if we take the risk, we get the reward."

From The Chatty
  • reply
    February 28, 2008 12:08 PM

    This from a company that would have gone out of business a few years ago were it not for the Tony Hawk games...

    • reply
      February 28, 2008 12:50 PM

      Right because we all know none of the quakes, cods, spidermans, Dooms, ultimate alliances, wolf's ect ect ect have enver made money.

      • reply
        February 28, 2008 1:12 PM

        I have never heard of those. I thought Activision was just some clever anagram for Tony Hawk. What is this "Quake" and "Doom" you speak of?

        • reply
          February 28, 2008 1:59 PM

          They are fake names I made up for the sake of argument.

      • reply
        February 28, 2008 3:13 PM

        It was probably Raven that actually put Activision on the map with Hexen, Heretic, and Soldier of Fortune. id too.

        I don't think Activision was ever in enough trouble to be threatened by going out of business. I don't know what the fuck this guy is talking about.

Hello, Meet Lola