GameSpot Details Gerstmann Situation; Claims Termination 'Unrelated' to Advertiser Pressure
by Chris Faylor, Dec 05, 2007 3:25pm PSTGameSpot has issued a lengthy response to the week-long scandal regarding the termination of editorial director Jeff Gerstmann, claiming that the editor was let go "purely for internal reasons" that were "unrelated to any publisher or advertiser." Meanwhile, Gerstmann spoke with MTV's Stephen Totilo about the nature of advertising relationships, though not about his termination itself.
Gerstmann was relieved of his position at GameSpot last Wednesday. Rumors immediately began swirling that he was fired in part because of his negative review of IO Interactive's Kane & Lynch: Dead Men (PC, PS3, X360).
At the time, publisher Eidos was heavily advertising the title on GameSpot. It was speculated that Eidos had pressured GameSpot parent company CNET into axing Gerstmann, a theory apparently backed by the removal of Gerstmann's harsh video review and an edit of his text.
Though GameSpot admits Eidos was upset by Gerstmann's negative review, the site states that its displeasure was "absolutely not" the cause of Gerstmann's termination, the removal of his video review, or the editing of his review text, citing GameSpot policy to "never let any [expressed publisher disappointment] result in a review score to be altered or a video review to be pulled." As before, GameSpot continues to decline to comment on the particular reasons for Gerstmann's termination.
"Realistic or not, I think readers should demand [a church and state separation between editorial and sales] from a publication," Gerstmann told MTV in response to recent events. "Some people probably think that's a little old-fashioned or hopelessly idealistic, given the changing nature of advertising these days, but there you go." His comments seem to suggest a belief that the editorial and ad separation may not always be at the level it should be, but that readers should call for it regardless.
According to GameSpot, the changes made to Gerstmann's review text were a result of a staff consensus that "the review's negativity did not match its 'fair' 6.0 rating," and to add clarifications about the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 multiplayer modes.
As for the removal of the video review, GameSpot points to what it calls "inferior" audio and limited video footage. The original, unedited video review has now been reposted on the site "in the spirit of full disclosure."
Meanwhile, the disappearance of the heavy Kane & Lynch advertising presence shortly after the rumors started was "purely coincidental" as "site-wide ad campaigns automatically change at midnight" and the campaign ended on November 29, 2007.
Skyrim Workshop touts 2M downloads, 2,500 mods
Xenonauts dev promises 'proper remake' of XCOM
Binary Domain demo available this week
Shack PSA: Angry Birds on Facebook today
Resistance: Burning Skies dawns on Vita in May
Comments
A: Both the text and video reviews of Kane & Lynch went up on Tuesday, November 13. The morning of Wednesday, November 14, the video was taken down due to concerns of quality. Specifically, its audio was deemed inferior due to a faulty microphone. There were also concerns about the limited amount of footage, which was unrepresentative of the game in the review.
WHAT? I call BS on this. The audio was perfectly fine from what I remember.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
hell the guys doing the firing may not have even known why they were doing the firing.
from just about any perspective one thing is clear... this situation just looks dirty.
significant edits of the article, complete removal of the video for 'suspicious' reasons, all kinds of cnet/gamespot employees saying things off the record that are incriminating, etc...
i have always admired a lot of what gamespot does and i'm sure there are still a lot of people there doing good honest work. it will blow over and in the end the less than 1% of gamers who are even aware of the situation will still visit the page.
however, if something like this happens again with gamespot within the near future... i think that may actually do measurable damage. it will take a few blows like this though to really hurt them. they are huge.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 7 replies.
Fuck, you know what, the perfect product/company doesn't even need a sales department. I'd much rather visit a site known for it's content, or purchase from a proven word-of-mouth company, than be told how fucking sweet a product is by some greased up, plaid sport jacket douchebag.
I despise sales and all of the shit they're able pull off because they somehow always have an 'in' with the brass. Yeah yeah, they're responsible for big-budget contracts and all that, but when they have a direct say in what is going to be delivered to the customers; something is very wrong. Said company is in it for the skrill, and a quality product can no longer be expected.
I don't buy that sales is a necessary evil. In my perfect world, business owners make a product for the people they want to make it for and nothing more. If I have to be convinced to spend my money with the business by way of sales, I probably don't actually want it.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 6 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 12 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 6 replies.
http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/levelup/archive/2007/12/05/reflections-on-videogame-publisher-and-employer-contempt-towards-the-enthusiast-press.aspx
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
A: We haven't decided when that will happen.
It'll be interesting to see if it's ever posted, and if so, then by whom, and how close does it resemble the console Kane & Lynch review.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
I am torn!