Intel Likely Entering High-End GPU Market
by Chris Remo, Jan 24, 2007 9:23am PSTMaking the rounds this week has been what appears to be confirmation of Intel entering the high-end GPU market dominated by NVIDIA and AMD-owned ATI. The news, which follows recent speculation, comes courtesy of Intel's own official jobs page, which outlines in fairly clear terms the company's new Visual Computing Group, which it claims is "aggressively positioned to advance the state of the art in graphics and other high-throughput workloads." The full blurb is as follows:
Intel's Visual Computing Group (VCG) has the mission to establish the future of computing for high-throughput applications. We are initially focused on developing advanced products based on a many-core architecture targeting high-end client platforms. We're aggressively positioned to advance the state of the art in graphics and other high-throughput workloads. Our vision is that the resulting ingredients and technology will extend to other platforms including mobile clients, servers, and embedded applications over time.Intel currently dominates the integrated graphics market--and by extension has a dominant stake in the overall PC graphics market--but the VCG plan seems to be set on targeting high end products with "many-core architecture" before later expanding to other less intensive platforms and embedded products. This marks Intel's first full-fledged entry into the discrete GPU market since its attempts after acquiring graphics company Real3D. There is no publicly revealed time frame for the project at this point. (Thanks Beyond3D for the find.)
Xenonauts dev promises 'proper remake' of XCOM
Binary Domain demo available this week
Shack PSA: Angry Birds on Facebook today
Resistance: Burning Skies dawns on Vita in May
Shack PSA: Mass Effect 3 demo out today
Comments
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 38 replies.
I have no doubt that if Intel really wanted to compete with Nvidia and ATI they could. They're a very smart semiconductor company with lots of money. If they want to break into the market in a serious way, it is a matter of choice and a big bucket of cash.
At least they didn't buy Nvidia.
this "new" graphics push is just more of the same worthless hardware. don't expect to be running crysis on intel graphics anytime soon. I'd be surprised if this junk could handle quake 2.
they are always behind the times by several years. maybe they could improve their hardware from being 5 years behind the technology curve to being only 4 years behind, that's about the most you could expect.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 6 replies.
This may be intel developing cards to build a GPU skill base that can be rolled into the CPU as a "graphics core" on your main processor. Or maybe they aren't going to develop cards at all, and jump straight to graphics on-die with the CPU. Video on the same die as the processing cores ... talk about bandwidth. Of course, you will lose the ability to upgrade video separately from graphics.
Lets not forget the Intel that was going to take over the HDTV market with their own brand of LCOS display chips.
Or the MP3 player they had on the market before Apple had an Ipod. Then dumped.
Or that they had a 3d chip dept already after buying real3d. Anybody remember the i740? Then it got dumped.
But this time Intel is serious, for real, they wont quit AGAIN! :)
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 9 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 6 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
They're more or less dominating in the CPU sector...anti trust case there.
Dominant in integrated graphics(granted...they suck, but still highest market share)
and now into descrete graphics...
well see...they're trying to come into the game a bit late. Nvidia would be the better choice for them, but I don't like the idea of Nvidia going bye bye...because Intel doesn't like other companies manufacturing their stuff, and so Nvidia cards wont run on AMD machines, and all that other stuff...chipsets for AMD gone, the list goes on...the consumer gets screwed in the end because inter-component compatibility dies.
If the GPU prices manage to be the same as they are in the USA/UK for future chips, i will be able to go dual/quad sli and whatnot. Haha, 500$ for a GPU will be sweet. I am going to buy as many as they can supply. Haha, i am going mad here.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
I wonder what kind of timeframe they are looking at for actual products.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.