• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

Get Out and Vote (for Video Games)

by Chris Remo, Nov 07, 2006 2:32pm PST
Related Topics – ESRB

For the United States voters out there, if you're still having trouble figuring out where to cast your support in today's midterm elections, Game Politics has assembled a handy guide highlighting video game-related track records on various senatorial, congressional, gubernatorial, and other state-level candidates currently on the ballot. Such stances are of course only relatively minor factors in a candidate's overall profile and platform, but Game Politics' summary is probably the only one-stop place to get candidate coverage of an issue unlikely to be covered by the mainstream press. At a glance, congressional and senatorial candidates who support video game or game industry legislation run the gamut from Democratic to Republican to independent, while in gubernatorial races, 80% of candidates supporting legislation are Democratic and 20% Republican.

* Hillary Clinton (D-NY): sponsor of the Family Entertainment Protection Act (FEPA) * Joe Lieberman (I-CT): his criticism of game violence in the mid-1990Â’s led directly to the formation of the ESRB * Rick Santorum (R-PA): backs HillaryÂ’s game initiatives, but also backs the ESRB * George Allen (R-VA): backs the ESRB rating system * Candidate Mike McGavick (R-WA): trying to unseat Democrat Maria Cantwell; he believes the entertainment industry will not regulate itself and wants to explore legislative solutions
Regardless of how much you take into account video game-related issues, if you're an eligible voter, get out there and exercise your franchise.




Comments

12 Threads | 49 Comments










  • I know it's an old word but I don't remember seeing "gubernatorial" until the last few years. About when Arnie got elected, in fact. I thought it was a joke about his pronunciation until I looked it up.

    Age, etymology and legitimacy aside, it is one ugly fucker of a word!

    Regarding the list, the ESRB seems like a good thing to me. Helps parents have a rough idea of what's in a game, so being in favour of that seems, on the face of it, to be a perfectly reasonable thing. Going further and using controversy surrounding video games tool to cynically further your political career, on the other hand, is despicable. (As is talking ignorant shit about things you know nothing about, if you want to give them the benefit of the doubt.) But who isn't despicable in politics these days? Not many. :(