• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

Making Sense of the Overtime Mess

by Alec Matias, May 31, 2005 10:10am PDT
Related Topics – Electronic Arts, Sony, Vivendi

Ever since the EA Spouse blog spread like wildfire across the Internet, plenty of attention has been focused on unpaid overtime in the game industry. Multiple class-action lawsuits have been filed against Sony Computer Entertainment America, Electronic Arts, and Vivendi Universal Games, among others. At the heart of the matter is that workers feel they've been improperly labeled as exempt from receiving overtime, which results in large financial losses to them since they're working just as long over 40 hours as they are under it. Making sense of it all is C|Net, who compiled a report that comprehensively explains the situation.

The recent rash of overtime suits in the game industry, and California's labor rules, could well backfire, EA spokesman Jeff Brown warned. He said higher labor costs could push the company to move more of its work out of the state, to places including a new studio being built in China. "This isn't a problem (just) for EA," Brown said. "This is a problem for the state of California." ... To [Tom Buscaglia, an attorney who founded an organization to increase the presence of the game industry in Florida], the lawsuits are a wake-up call for the game industry to switch to more reasonable hours and to keep talented people from leaving the industry. "Ultimately, it makes for better games," he said. "And it makes for a better lifestyle for the people who make them."




Comments

31 Threads | 114 Comments
  • I happen to work in a little different industry and saw this wonderful article. Every single employee in our company works 12 hour days, we are payed hourly and not salaried. I get to work at around 8:30am and leave most of the time around 7pm. Most employees get there at 8am and leave at around 8pm. This drives me nuts. I applied for a job that was around 40 hours not 60. They knock off 5 hours of overtime automatically as a company "courtesy". I think that's bullshit, that's my time I spent with you when I could have been home doing something else. I am starting to force myself to get there at 9am and leave at 6pm regardless of how much I have left to do. It's not fair to me to usurp all of my time regardless of my compensation. People still have to take care of themselves (mentally, physically, etc). If you want someone to work 60-80hrs a week normally then you should just be up front about it so they can make a choice about the job. It's always good to get a clearly written job description up front with your expected contribution. If your job description says "we require 40 hours of your time per week" and you're putting in 40-50 then you're doing your job. If they need more labor they need to hire more people. If you're inefficient at your job they should hire someone else. As far as I see it, if you're just an employee and you do your job and can't get it done in the time alloted then it's your responsibility to report the defficiency in labor to your management. Let it be their problem, take care of yourself, and do what you can












  • The Company I work for just got audited over the past 6 or so months by the Texas Department of Labor.
    Needless to say I just got PAAAAIIIID....

    What will most likely happen is that the Labor department that is doing the investigation will make a suggestion as to how to settle the claims.
    If the Employess kept time sheets (we do here) then they would have a record and the DOL would base the recommendation off that value. Its some weird hair brain number too...:)
    If they don't I'm not sure how they can prove how many hours that they actually did indeed work. Unless they happen to work in a call center and have phone records...
    /shrug
    Good luck is all I have to say...