Carmack On Q1 Code Release
by Maarten Goldstein, Dec 22, 1999 3:33am PSTJohn Carmack made two posts to /. on of course the Quake1 source code which was just released. This post talks about the confusement on whether code and content are seperated by the GPL license, and this post is about the fact that releasing source code is hard to get past the biz guys, but is just a good thing.
Heh. You don't know how much trouble it is to convince biz oriented people that this isn't just plain stupid.
While thinking in terms of money and profit are probably good ways of understanding the way most things work in the world, don't let yourself become so jaded or cynical to think that it is the ONLY way things work.
I do think The World Would Be A Better Place if all software companies released older code so users still interested could work with it or learn from it. (I'm not holding my breath, though)
John Carmack
Daily Filter: Tiger Woods PGA Tour 13: The Masters, Sins of a Solar Empire: Rebellion
Dear Esther Mac port confirmed
Killing Floor hits a million sales, discounted on Steam
Jam Live Music Arcade announced for PS3, Xbox 360
Metal Gear Online to quietly die this summer




Comments
\"i think azngirl is wrong when she says the q2 physics were changed in patches...i dont remember anything like that\" Well, if you can\'t remember, then you obviously shouldn\'t assume I\'m wrong then.
#58: no, I\'m electric, and if you touch me.. you\'ll get shocked shocked shocked.
Been reading a lot of this q1/q2 crap, and that\'s what it basicly is....a bunch of crap. Myself? I realize that q1 is/always has been the better game, but one thing I noticed you saying........
\"instant switch weapons in q1 were an id \"mistake\" too...guess they suck huh?\"
Wrong. They were instant because they did\'nt have the time to do animations, that\'s not a MISTAKE, and if it was....they would have patched it ala q2-suck style. Guess that kinda makes your claim to Azn\'s \"contradictions\" kinda ...invalid, huh?
-Erik
when i spoke of the stupidity of grouping ALL q1/q2 players together i was not referring to a clan of 9 or 10 players, i meant ALL....ALL q1 players are not the same, you dont ALL agree on everything, etc...you seem to realize this point in #50 when you say that one individual q1 player losing to a q2 player means nothing...
to recap, i dont care about your opinions, i was just pointing out what i thought were contradictions...
instant switch weapons in q1 were an id \"mistake\" too...guess they suck huh?
that q2 was a mistake. or id for that matter,thier laughing all the way to the bank
before q3 was even thought of,I\'m sure thier pockets got fat as hell off q2.
funny tho in a year or two newbie q3 players who never played q2
will prolly be sayin shit like q2 sx,and what is quake1 all about?
mabey by then I\'ll be a vet too
youre the same person that said this:
\"I\'m also sorry to hear that you overlooked the fact that q2 was a mistake.\"
and this:
\"the so called \'hardcore\' gamers in q2 is a farce\"
?
i never said anything about a personal prefrence for q1/q2/q3...i have all 3 of them on my computer and i play all of them from time to time and i think they are all great games...i dont know anything about q1 / q2 /q3 players as a whole and i think its stupid to talk about them as if they are one group...
I know its annoying to read retarded posts like #18, but you have to ignore that kind of drivel. Replying and starting Q1vsQ2 debates accomplishes nothing apart from more insult flinging. No one cares if someone is \"hardcore\" or not. It really doesnt matter. Play whatever you enjoy, thats the point of it after all. I didn\'t enjoy Quake2 at all, so i didnt play it. Why the hell should I ?
I really don\'t give a shit if anyone disagrees =)
was a mistake! #40 obviously got hold of some bad crack!
I give props to q1 and its players who were lucky enough to partake
in a grounbreaking classic like q1,even tho I dont play it I know if it wasn\'t
for q1 there prolly wouldnt be a q3arena,and since Stevo will soon have
a q3 server up,yes azn9irl you will be getting mopped by me personnally
Deucy
would someone who sleeps a lot be a hardcore sleeper?...or just lazy?...
Why play an inferior, unentertaining game?
I am pretty damn good at q3arena and q2,since q3arena is a combination
of both q1 and q2 its safe to say that you would get your veteran ass
mopped the fuck up on q1 by a NEWBIE!
see a pattern? q2 required much more strategy than q1. there was a need to be methodical in your movements. not that there wasn\'t in quake1, but a lot of the method in q1 was \'grab the rocket launcher and shoot people\'.
now, i love both q2 and q1 (q1 moreso, in fact) but i think that saying q2 was a \'mistake\' is blatantly poor judgement. maybe you don\'t like being slower and more methodical than q1, and i respect that; however, there are people who prefer the slower-paced action of q2 to that of q1. and, obviously, slower-paced action isn\'t all too ineffective - look at the huge numbers of Counter-Strike players there are. and if you say that CS players aren\'t \'hardcore\' gamers.. well.. i\'ll bend you over and spank you in a game of doom. :P
A mistake indeed it was, along with the newbie players q2 drug in with it. Sure, I\'ve ran across some players that came from q2 that I thought was very good... but I still wouldn\'t give that credit to q2... I bet if they started out playing q1, they would have more skill than they knew what to do with. In comparison (and since we previously mentioned the word \'hardcore\'), q2 is definitly softcore compared to how hardcore q1 is. Does that confuse you? Think pr0n, think pr0n.
Of course there\'s such a thing as hardcore gamers. Where do you get off saying there isn\'t? A hardcore gamer is commonly known (at least by other gamers) as sausages (aka: harcore gamers). Somone who devotes most of their time/life to games. Hardcore can be used as a word (noun) to refer to a person, place or thing. yep.
Get a clue: Adj. Something that is of an extreme, committed nature. An obsessive follower of a game, for example, may be called a hardcore gamer.
Did it also occur to you that some people\'s tastes change? I for example played Quake/QW continuously since Quake was released, until Quake2 came out, which I played pretty much continously until Q3Test came out. Now I play Quake3 exclusively. Do I suck because I used to play Quake2? Do I suck less now that I play Quake3? Or do I not suck because I used to play Quake1 and was good at it?
What\'s with this religious war. I can see how people can be pissed at an \"usurper\" like UT, but starting a family feud between id games is just plain childish and pointless.