Coppermine @ Anandtech
by Steve Gibson, Oct 25, 1999 6:11pm PDTThe last Intel Coppermine review of the evening is over at Anandtech. They of course talk in depth about the impacts of the new 0.18 micron technology (ok the technology isnt new, but using it in a P3 desktop CPU @ 733mhz is) and all that other stuff. Check out these benchmarks, it looks like Intel @667mhz is actually faster than Athlon @700mhz with the new 820 chipset. Sucks for AMD eh?.
Daily Filter: Sleeping Dogs, Transformers: Fall of Cybertron
Kingdoms of Amalur needed 3 million sales 'to break even,' RI governor says
Former Modern Warfare devs wanted to give Call of Duty series a 'rest'
Konami accused of bank loan fraud over Def Jam Rapstar
Capcom aims to shorten development cycle
Comments
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
_______________ PH34R _______________
damn you with your blue line!
---------------------------------------
- Damn It -
- -
- I don\'t see any girly pics. -
- Oh well... -
- -
- Anyway, Coppermine all the way! -
---------------------------------------
A .18 P3 isn\'t any better clock for clock, save for the fact that it makes less heat and that may help overall performance a bit, but a clock is a clock. Smaller processes just let you have more of \'em.
Then of course while he\'s gone I let anybody come in here and smoke who wants to, just in case there are any residual pockets...
Anyway that\'s my quick Suck for now.. I hope it was good for ya baybeh
great. I have no doubt that Anand knows his shit about hardware. Of all the reviewers I\'d have to trust his the most, my point is that these sites might be distracted by whatever else is beyond their control. Are they setting up true labs and double checking their results? And just because one knows Hardware doesn\'t make him/her a good reviewer, statistician, or writer. Just look at Tom Pabst, a joke of a benchmarker who obviously wants Intel to eat his Euro schlong and can\'t take criticism if his life depended on it. I can\'t take anything Tom says with any respect anymore after that whole Q3test timedemo fiasco...
Don\'t believe everything you read. My prediction is the benchmarks we see today will be turned upside down once Q3 is released until the Graphic card companies rewrite their drivers... Just a waste of time to be benching tests right now...
Anand is one of the best, most impartial benchmarkers out there. When it comes to hardware, he\'s forgotten more than you know. Trust his stuff.
They do the benchmarks at 640*480 to make sure the tests reflect
the speed of the CPU and not the gfx card. If you up the res enough
all the CPUs will converge to about the same performance because the
bottleneck of the system is the fill-rate of the 3d card.
By lowering the res (and using a T&L card) they are getting an idea
of how well the CPU does with all the AI/physics, as opposed to how
well it does T&L/rendering which will both be handled in dedicated
hardware by most upcoming 3d cards.
psurge
yo dumb dumb, 640x480 best measures the cpu...anything over that starts measuring video card performamnce. Whats it like being stoopid?
ROFL (oops just proved my own immaturity to the world)
psurge
i dont know whats scarier, the fact that these people exist, or that they are so stupid they needed to create an FAQ