• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

Violent Appeals

by Steve Gibson, Sep 27, 2002 1:00pm PDT

Here's one for the gaming is good side. A group of international scholars on Wednesday filed a brief with federal appeals court hoping to strike down a St. Louis ordinance related to younger kids and violent games. The scholars came from places like MIT, UCLA, and London University.

In mid-April, a federal court in Missouri upheld a St. Louis County ordinance requiring parental consent for minors to purchase video games that depict graphic violence. [...] In May, a California congressman introduced a bill in the House of Representatives that would make it a federal crime to sell or rent video games showing violence, prostitution or drug use to anyone under the age of 17 without parental consent.
Amazingly after years of taking beatings it seems that computer games are getting a bit more support. It's always the crazy new thing that kids are doing blamed every generation it seems. Comic books, D&D, etc. Thanks /.




Comments

13 Threads* | 18 Comments*






  • In May, a California congressman introduced a bill in the House of Representatives that would make it a federal crime to sell or rent video games showing violence, prostitution or drug use to anyone under the age of 17 without parental consent.

    I'd be very interested in what this congresscritter thinks the Constitutional authority for such a law would be. I'm looking over Article I Section 8, but I'm not seeing anything giving Federal Congress the power to set minimum ages for purchase, or any broader power that would encompass that. Furthermore, I'd bet that congresscritter never even considered the issue of Constitutional authority before proposing that ridculous law.