Carmack on DOOM3 Hardware

97
A little more sumpin sumpin from Carmack discussing hardware and DOOM3 related things. Firstly our unofficial Carmack correspondent Abrasion got a bit from The Carmack on the future 64bit CPUs and how they will get along with DOOM3:

Q: "Assuming that the Hammer CPU is out within 3 months of D3's release, and Windows ?? 64bit is also out, what do you think the chances are of a 64bit binary for Doom 3? - slim? - none? - "mildly possible" - or damn certain?

A: Slim. A 64 bit binary is likely to be slightly slower than a 32 bit binary, because pointers will consumer more memory bandwidth. You only get a speed benefit from 64 bit when you need long integers, or you need to access more than (roughly) 2 gigs of memory.

Also, the Beyond3D guys have a few more very techy questions (Thanks HomeLAN) with JC talking about video stuff.

Steve Gibson is the cofounder of Shacknews.com. Originally known as sCary's Quakeholio back in 1996, Steve is now President of Gearbox Publishing after selling Shacknews to GameFly in 2009.

From The Chatty
  • reply
    June 11, 2002 10:12 AM

    DOOM ENGINE MUST BE USED TO MAKE JK3

    • reply
      June 11, 2002 10:39 AM

      that would kick a LOT of ass.

    • reply
      June 11, 2002 12:16 PM

      and SOF3, gore so realistic you'll hurl!

    • reply
      June 11, 2002 12:46 PM

      That, and Alien vs Predator III as well. Those games have been great, but adding a good engine would help =/

    • reply
      June 11, 2002 2:17 PM



      RAVEN SHOULD BE BANNED FROM MAKING GAMES EVER AGAIN! they shovel shit into the box and sell it, and you mindless fools buy it because of idiot reviewers who give anything with the star wars name on it 10.0/5 star ratings.

      jedi knight 2 and sof 2 are the worst games ive played in a long time. they are a waste of cd's.

      • reply
        June 11, 2002 2:20 PM

        i agree about sof 2, but jk2 was pretty good, the multiplayer is great

      • reply
        June 11, 2002 3:29 PM



        You're the worst poster I've ever read. Go back to masturbating in the kitchen, foolio.

      • reply
        June 11, 2002 3:38 PM

        diddly0 - SOF2 isn't good, JK2 isn't good - but they BOTH get better as you progress (Seriously I hated JK2) - give it about 90 minutes and it becomes quite nice.

        SOF2 on the other hand I HEAR gets better, so far I don't like it.
        and yes people do over-rate Raven games and Star Wars games.

        • reply
          June 11, 2002 4:05 PM

          The only redeeming thing about JKII, I thought, was the lightsaber. The lightsaber, and lightsaber only multiplayer, is awesome.
          But the rest of the game sucks. At one point I was thinking to myself, "Here I am, in a swamp, doing jumping puzzles.... I'm in game Hell."

          At the end of the game I felt it wasn't nearly worth the frustration. I can't count how many times I spent 45 minutes looking around a level for the one switch I needed to push, or tiny cave I needed to crawl into, or security key I needed. It was the opposite of fun. Nar Shadda made me want to claw my eyes out with those snipers.

    • reply
      June 11, 2002 3:35 PM

      OMG i totally agree. That is such a sexy idea.......

Hello, Meet Lola