• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

Creative on Fill Rate

by Steve Gibson, Oct 08, 1999 11:30am PDT
Related Topics – Creative

Ever since that statement from Glaze3D about the GeForce benchmarks sucking, Creative Labs has been in quite a huff. Have a look at their latest response in an attempt to make the card look better. I love that "I can't tell you why because of NDA" stuff. It's my favorite.

... do you always have to read a Z [buffer]? Nope, in some systems you can skirt this issue as well. Because of NDA's I can't tell you how Nvidia or 3Dfx or S3 or anybody actually gets more bandwidth out of a system, all I can say is that the simplistic calculations are utterly beside the point.




Comments

41 Threads* | 40 Comments

























  • It\'s true that Bitboys haven\'t delievered anything, but Creative is just trying to dispute their claim by attacking the messenger, not the message.

    I find it funny how Creative says \"Q3 at 60 fps on the GeForce\" and yet all the benchmarks so far show that the board is almost the same speed as the TNT2. What do they think, people will just ignore the benchmarks and buy into the whole \"offload your CPU and have 5x more polygons\" mantra while evidence shows it to be false?

    Personally I really really HOPE the GeForce will be a kickass, in the SDRAM version, because I\'m itching to buy a new graphics board right now that doesn\'t require a CPU upgrade and that will make a huge difference with my TNT. The GeForce has been disappointing so far.