• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

Late Night Theatrics

by Steve Gibson, Jan 31, 2002 8:39pm PST
Related Topics – Hollywood

Tonights Late Night Theatrics was going to be on time but I decided to finish my sandwich instead. Here's a random compilation of notable movie news, what's coming out this weekend, and what's doing good.

- DVHS? Videotape? WHAT THE HELL DONT DO THIS TO US. - More LOTR DVD stuff, it comes out in November of course. - Charlie's Angel's 2 prolly wont have Bill Murray in it, doh. - The return of Robocop? That movie was good stuff. - Casting info on Terminator 3. Shooting starts in a few months. Coming This Weekend: - Birthday Girl - Nicole Kidman - Slackers Tops This Week: - Black Hawk Down - Snow Dogs - A Walk to Remember - A Beautiful Mind - Count of Monte Cristo




Comments

36 Threads* | 89 Comments
  • actually being one who owns a widescreen HDTV, I can tell you that viewing a 480 movie in progressive is a great improvement over interlace mode. From the colors to the depth to the fricking blackness in peoples pours, you see it.

    Current DVD players will NOT EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER play anything above 480 resolution, PERIOD. DVD's DO NOT have enough storage. In order to fit EVERY MOVIE CURRENTLY RELEASED ON DVD's the production crew COMPRESS'S the movie so it can be on a dvd. You know, ever downloaded that low-quality porn then resize the screen larger? Well, some DVD's look like that, only throw in a non-anamorphic fake widescreen format (as in black borders on the top, bottom, left side, AND right side) and that's what you get.. This is so there is room on the DVD for special features and commentary by your least favorite actor.. Now the "Superbit" DVD's have done a lot to improve on this as all Superbit re-released DVD's are widescreen and include the very very cool DTS for sound, but all the same it will never ever ever be able to give you a resolution higher than 480p because 1) The dvd player just cant do it and 2) A dvd disc has not enough room for a full length mega movie without compression.


  • I saw the movie Gang Related an hour ago, http://us.imdb.com/Title?0118900 .

    I wasn't expecting much and I didn't have a clue what I was gonna watch. This movie was a pleasent surprise. It's not perfect, far from it, but it has some clever (but seen before) tricks up it's sleave and it pulls it off neatly.

    Watch it without knowing anything about the plot and you'll be pleased. Don't read the comments on IMDB they are fucking spoilers all of them!
    Just know that it's a crime drama that quickly gets complex and takes a lot of turns.
    Tupac is actually very convincing in this movie (more so than in Gridlock'd) and James Belushi is great as always.
    Oh yeah and Kool Moe Dee has a small role in it (whoop whoop).

    I'm gonna watch Shadow of the Vampire on DVD a litle later...



















  • "Henwood plays a man from Lake-town, one of several men in the scene at Rivendell where everyone argues about what to do with the ring. Most of the men, including Henwood, don't have any lines in the movie."

    That whole sequence is severly cut - and you can tell. Right after Aaragon says his thing about "the ring answers to Sauron alone", the camera switches to Gandalf who says "Aaragon is right". It cuts immediatly to Elrond - ommiting the line "the ring must be destroied" - which made it into the trailer.

    The whole film, while good, is poorly cut. You can tell they had a four hour movie that was trimmed down to three.

    Another example of the bad editing was the cross-fading near the end. Was it just me or did that sequece seem hokey and taped on. It "felt" like someone behind the camera was like... "geez... we really gotta get this thing wrapped up. WTF? Another whole friggin chapter to go? WTF was JR smoking?!?!"

    :)