• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

How Many Q3Test Players?

by Steve Gibson, Sep 25, 1999 7:09pm PDT
Related Topics – id software, Quake 3 Arena, Q3Test

Looks like it was a fairly slow weekend, the one interesting bit is a .plan update from Graeme up there at id Software on the number of Quake3 games that have been started up since the 20th of this month. Check this stat out:

A few of you have asked about the message of the day text. It’s giving you your exe startup number since last Monday. So basically, we’ve had over 2 million Quake 3 Arena games start worldwide since 9/20/99. That works out to around 4 games every second.
Of course, this stat doesnt even include all of the LAN games that are being fired up every day not connected to the internet.




Comments

119 Threads | 116 Comments



  • Light does move at different speeds depending on the medium it travels through. Through sodium at 20 degrees K, it moves at 60 KMPH.

    Electromagnetic particles never move slower or faster. (This may seem like a direct contradiction to what i just said, but keep reading).

    Depending on the wavelength of the particle, and the height of the wave, the particle will get from point A to point B in a different amount of time - BUT -

    Think of it this way - If you drive down the road in a straight line at 40 KMPH, it will take you one hour to move 40 kilometres. If you drive down the road but continously swerve left and right, it will take you much longer to travel that same 40 KM, EVEN THOUGH your speedometer says you\'re moving at teh same speed.

    It is the same with light. Red light has a different wavelength than Blue light, and so they get from point A to point B at a different speed EVEN THOUGH they are still both moving at the speed of light. When light moves through sodium, it has a crazily tall and short wavelength, which makes it travel millions of times slower.

    BTW - another thing to think about.
    When we get the \"red shift\" from a far away star, the wavelength of the light we recieve is no different (from the pov of the far-away star) but to us, it is smaller.
    Everything is relative to everything.


























  • A wormhole would not technically make you travel faster than light, it would merely make two points in space connect when normally they couldn\'t. You would travel through the wormhole at non-relatavistic velocities, but your journey of a year, say, would bring you billions of light years away. Pretty nifty, and technically possible, but you\'d need to lace it with exotic matter, which only an extremely advanced civilization would be able to manage, due to some crazy stuff going on with them (like negative energy densities in local space). That\'s way far off in the future (not the 2040\'s like Event Horizon would have us believe, more like 3000+). I\'m personally betting on cryo-ships as the space travel method of choice for inter-solar travel once (if) we get to that point, at least for the next few hundred years. Remember, people in the 50\'s thought we would have robot housekeepers and be living on Pluto by now...


  • No no no no... It\'s true that when you get closer to the speed of light your mass increases, but this simply entails that you cannot go faster than light. Why? Because the more massive an object is, the more energy it takes to get it close to the speed of light. Even to get a single atomic particle close to the speed of light requires HUGE particle accelerators that consume huge amounts of energy. Now if you realize that a whole spaceship is made up of trillions of atoms...
    So as the spaceship gets closer to the speed of light it gets heavier, hence it takes more energy to make it go faster (exponentially more) hence it\'s harder to get it to the speed of light. Since it would have an infinite mass at the speed of light, it would take infinite energy to get there.

    So there must be some other way you can travel \"faster than light\" (like wormholes or something).