The AtHome Shutdown
by Maarten Goldstein, Dec 05, 2001 12:51pm PSTWith AT&T dropping its bid on Excite@Home, there's only one thing left for the troubled Internet provider. And that is shutting down, in February of next year. Now that almost all the cable providers that use AtHome have a transitional contract for 3 months during which they will put customers on their own network, AtHome won't be servicing anyone after that point it seems like right now. Thanks Conan Ford.
The Excite.com Web site wonÂ’t be affected by the current brouhaha. InfoSpace Inc., a Web-site operator in Bellevue, Wash., has been running the Excite site, in partnership with iWon Inc., as part of its purchase last week of some of Excite At HomeÂ’s media assets, including domain names, trademarks and user traffic associated with the Excite.com Web site. In terminating the asset offer, AT&T maintained that Excite, Redwood City, Calif., had significantly violated the agreement in numerous ways, including the termination of AT&TÂ’s service.
New Pandaren mounts revealed for World of Warcraft
New Copernicus screens leaked in fan forum
Free Mass Effect 3: Rebellion Pack coming May 29
Diablo 3 hotfixes finally detailed
When Vikings Attack coming to PS3 and Vita, with cross-play
Comments
we have to use outlook now, kind of a bummer because I hate the viruses you get with it.
3Mbs bi directional. sweeeet.
just have to wait for the new comp.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Northpoint, Rythms and now At Home. Could Covad be the next to follow? We are back to the Baby Bells and the big cable companies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
You know the competition drove them out.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 6 replies.
Cox is happy that they negotiated an interim agreement with Excite@Home, & expects no interruption in service as they complete their own network & transition everyone over. I knew this from the agreement the other day, but it's nice to hear it straight from the source. Yay!
moving day is coming, moving day is coming
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
LAUGH DAMN IT! IT WAS FUNNY...
I think @home was a bit of a queasy idea from the start, especially after they bought Excite. That a provider (Shaw) that at one time was 25% of @Home subscribers never bought onto the idea of relying on home.net for routing says a lot.
Rogers, the other Canadian provider, is a little more screwed. A year ago they declined to partner with Shaw in staking out away from @Home, and decided to stay with @Home loyally until the end.