• Join Us |
  • |
  • Sign in with:

Wolfenstein TEST Impressions

by Steve Gibson, Sep 15, 2001 5:14pm PDT
Related Topics – Return to Castle Wolfenstein

The story below and in the comments you guys should be able to dig up some mirrors of where to get the Wolfenstein demo. After you get the demo and check it out, here's a new thread for sharing your thoughts on the thing if you get a chance to play it. Please keep your mirrors searching etc contained to the release thread. So.. what do you guys think? Here's a batch of screenshots of the demo Maarten and I just took on the LAN. Please ignore page two, I've been up for way too many hours straight.

Click to enlarge [more bad screenshots]





Comments

206 Threads | 601 Comments


  • I see alot of potential, and the beach level is actually pretty fun.

    They have a looong way to go with the art in order to bring it up to MoH levels, no matter what Ominous says.

    I understand it's a test rather than a demo, but my advice is to release an update for this test prior to releasing the game. The nay-sayers here would probably try it again if the graphics and netcode performance were improved.

    It's fun for a while - the servers available right now are pretty shaky however and may lead people to think the netcode is 100% responsible for the lag.
    I have to re-iterate the Art point - there is alot that is good here, but the animations and textures(even at sv_fps 100 and r_picmip 0) are looking dated and less fluid than q3.

    Interesting teamplay.
    Gameplay is this game's strongpoint so far, rather than atmosphere.

  • I'm going to refrain from making qualitative judgements for now. I'm starting a thread for SPECIFIC wishes and adjustments and stuff, hopefully to be of some use to Nerve/id.

    Feel free to add your own, or post your support for other people's ideas.

    My specific wishes:

    1. Friendly Fire default to off. I know it makes for a "better game" in a testing environment, but in the wilds of the Internet it means that grief players and team killers have a powerful tool to ruin the game for everyone.

    2. The game browser is wacky. It frequently shows me games that seem quite un-full only for the game to tell me it's full when I try to join.

    3. Don't show me games on the game browser if I can't join them. If a game is for pings over 300 and I have a 120, don't even show it to me. Or at least put a filter there for me to turn that kind of thing off (ie... "hide games outside ping range" and "hide passworded games" would be nice).

    4. When a game is full or passworded or something and I can't join, and I hit ESC to get rid of the message, why does it go back to the main menu instead of the multiplayer server list?

    5. Please let it remember my sort order. (ie, ascending by ping, descending by player count, whatever) I'm tired of not being able to join a game, hitting esc to go back to the main menu (see #4), and then having to re-sort the list by ping every damn time. =)

    6. A bit TOO MUCH kick on the mauser. Other than that sniping is pretty balanced...powerful, but not more powerful than other classes (as sniping often ends up). Maybe let you move a bit more before kicking you out of the scope view.

    7. On this map, I think it would be fair and appropriate to give the Axis a 10-second head start or something, to get in position. It seems like they should be ready when the Allies arrive.

    8. The spawn points for Axis need to be staggered a bit more. A spawn-camper with a flamethrower is too powerful.

    9. I know it's just a test, but in the final, how about a "favorites list" in the MP list menu? When I find a great server, I want to be able to play on it again easily.

    Anyone have any others? Specific suggestions and bugs and stuff, now, not overall qualitative judgements...

  • I've been looking at the development of RtCW for quite a while, and some of the screenshots have had me totally in awe (everyone's seen that one with the skeleton and the cobweb, as well as the one with the cable-car outside at night going up a mountain).

    But this is vastly disapointing - even when i acknowledge full well this is a test.

    I am getting very poor graphical performance at 800x600x32 (detail levels all to medium) on a 1ghz Athlon/256MbRAM/GF2. And I reckon that that's unacceptable. When using the fixed guns on the level, My frame rate inexplicably drops from around 25fps (est) to less than 5! I don't understand why though.

    The guns are incredibly uninspired with about 5 different machine guns, the only thing that stands out is the flamethrower simply for its eyecandy. The lietenant's airstikes etc are crippled by the fact that apparently in 1940 people could only throw grenades 5 feet.

    Graphically I am vastly unimpressed (the flamethrower is nice though) the textures and models are of much lower quality than i expected, for comparison, they look very poor compared to max payne, and the outdoor sections not only look pretty bland and uninspiring but incur a heavy frame-rate penalty even on my system.

    I can't make up my mind yet if the 30-second respawn delay is clever and contributing to gameplay, or irritatingly stupid.... i'm beginning to lean toward the latter but my opinion is not yet made up.

    The map design seems ok for this beach level, but it's strictly standard - and impossible to call inspiringly original.

    Effects such as bullets hitting sand seem pixelated and low res.

    The game seems to add nothing graphically to what we have seen 2 years ago in quake 3, except for running at 1/2 the frame rate. The flamethrower is the only exception to this, but the flame effect of people who are on fire is woefully poor.

    I am in total agreement with those who have described the test as mod-like and amateurish - it IS for all the world looking like a Mod. Hopefully before release they can sort out the thing performance wise, and also enhance is graphically somehow (although this is unlikely at this late stage). The only saving grace for this game is if the single-player turns out to be extroadinarily compelling, which hopefully it will be, considering this is supposedly the focus of the game. I'm not expecting the game to do well as a multiplayer offering.
    Advice to those who haven't downloaded - 56k'ers don't bother with it, DSL/Cable+ download if you're curious but you're not missing much.















  • Well, i played from 7 pm till 1am so i think i can share a bit more info:

    LAG: Do not listen to all these people carping about lag. There seemed to be an even mix of high quality servers (good luck getting on one labeled [Id]) and servers that made goatse.cx man look good (whoooaaah). For all you newbies, this is how you determine if its the netcode or the server. You get on and if the pings change when 1-2 people join ITS THE FRICKING SERVER. They are either bandwidth limited (cablemodem) or processor limited (pulling that tandy 1000EX out of the garage). I was dissapointed with lag till i got on some high quality servers. I'm use to 50 ping normally, but i played from 9 till 1am with 150 ping and you know what? I topped my side consistently. (more on this later).

    Sounds: Now really, how much different can you make a submachine gun sound from another sub machine gun? not a whole lot of variety in sound on those in this game, but, ummmm, i wasn't really expecting there to be? the landing sound seemed a bit loud. the panzer (RL) was so totally awesome for sound (especially the splut at the end when you mushed up 3-4 allies). the installation MG were a bit low on sound. the volume on them should be cranked up a bit. the ingame voice communication is great, just need get your team to FRICKING listen when you yell for ammo or medic.

    Video: Who the freak cares if its based on the Q3 engine. that means at least it runs good on NVIDIA cards. Ever download the red fraction demo and get less than 30 fps? with less than 10 players i can run at 1024 32bit trilinear high detail (athlon 900 256 mb ram geforce 2 ) but when i got on the 32 player games i had to go down to 800x600 to average >40 fps (at times it was 100, but out in the open with lots of airstrikes it would slow down some). Visually very impressive, much better than anything else out there right now. Check out the faces on the models... VERY detailed. For those complaing its too dark, use powerstrip and turn up your gamma real time duh!!!!
    If anyone has seen Enemy at the Gates (war movie/sniper) just released, the video they released of rtcw reminds me alot of that.

    Gameplay:
    1)Soldier: panzerfaust is simply hilarious, powerful and awesome. Notice overpowered is not in there. Sure you can track a group of three coming, and blast them to smithereens, but the reload time keeps it from being overpowered, because you'll be killed by their medic with his piddly submachine gun as your gun gets ready.
    Gatling gun:: fun, but no range on it, and the spin up seems to overbalance it so its not effective enough. if you get spun up, nothing will stop you besides the panzer before you chew them up (close to mid range) but by the time you get spun up, you're dead half the time. Even shooting from one catwalks to the other where the stairs come up, it doesnt have enough concentration to kill. Oh, BTW, you can fire with it while moving. i didn't realize this for at least the first 15 min trying to use it.
    Sniper rifle: I have been an excellent, rail/awp/scout user and i must say that the sniper rifle is frustating. ya i can get 8-10 kills per round, but the ammount that you miss with it makes the ones you get less savory. major gripe: you should be able to shoot point blank with it unzoomed and have some semblence of accuracy. I mean if they are 10 foot away and i aim at their chest it SHOULDN'T hit UNDER their feet. You cannot reasonably expect to move zoomed in before it kicks you out of zoom. Thus, any sniper already in position and steadied will win every shot (if they can aim) because of the time it takes to get steadied. you can still hit people with a red bar on your left, but you kill less often. I love sniping, and so this is a major dissapointment for me that sniping isn't more effective.

    cont next post










  • I'm sure this is a driver issue.i run win 98 with a voodoo 5500 i have tried a half a dozen different drivers and still get the same problem...every time i get into a game everything runs and look great but all the lettering...like the chat box and words that pop up on the screen , i dont know what they say because everything is all pixilated and non redable..weird , is there a setting i should adjust or is this smthing i cant fix im totally stumped..it seems i had this problem in quake 3 at some point but not anymore ...hmm..anybody have this problem?...thnks



  • People complaining about sounds:

    Do you not remember Q3test? It didn't have all original sounds, either. It gradually had its sounds updated to new stuff.

    Id is damned if they do, damned if they don't. They want to get a test out before the game is released and official demos are produced, to make sure there are no glaring issues, but people still want to treat it like a demo that is exactly like the final product. If they don't release a test, there is a possibility for something major to be missed in gameplay or technical issues, and they will have to change it post release, causing tons of people to whine they are changing gameplay after they learned to exploit whatever it is that is wrong.