Napster Deal With Record Labels
by Maarten Goldstein, Jun 05, 2001 11:33am PDTAfter being sued by all of them, Napster has now reached an agreement with 3 record labels (AOL Time Warner, EMI and Bertelsmann's BMG) to sell songs offered by MusicNet. MusicNet is a RealNetworks company which will offer songs for money. Napster's supposed to do the same thing, and stop any free file sharing. Isn't this all too late? It seems a lot of people have left Napster for other alternatives and it's not like you're downloading great music week after week while you are paying $5.95 to $9.95 a month.
The MusicNet discussions mark yet another significant concession for Napster, which had hoped to ride its once-overwhelming popularity into a position of strength for negotiating with the labels. The record industry has been waging a legal war, suing the file-swapping service for copyright infringement, and the battle has taken its toll; the file-swapping service is seeing its audience walk out as a court order has forced progressively more music off the service.
GameFly to publish iOS, Android games
Judge recommends US Xbox 360 ban in Motorola dispute
ArmA 2 'Day Z' mod patch adds sickness
Diablo 3 declared 'fastest selling PC game' ever
Spec Ops: The Line PC demo arrives June 19
Comments
time to delete it.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 15 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 12 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
They didn't.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 9 replies.
KAZAA.COM , gg..
It would figure that RealNetworks would try to distribute their own proprietary format. It would suck if that happens.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
about a year ago...
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
even though i downloaded like a fiend off it.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 3 replies.
I remember seeing a few interviews at the Napster offices back when Metallica just started suing them and they were all smug and shit, playing football in the offices.
Looks like the only place they're going to be playing football now is at the unempoyment office!!!!!!!
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.
It redefines POS software. Not only do you have to pay to download the songs but you have to keep paying a renewal fee so the songs don't "expire".
I'm sure this is going to fly with the consumers especially when there's AudioGalaxy, iMesh, Kazaa/Morpheus, GNutella clones and the old methods of ftp, irc, newsgroups and hotline.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 5 replies.
I can remember when PC games started being published in CD-Rom format only, no diskettes. The average price of a game jumped from thirty five and forty dollars to twice that, right up there with console game prices. Why did this happen, because the publishers figured they had piracy beat. They had a format that could not be copied by the average person. CD burners were very expensive and hence few in number. Suddenly the demand for CD burners went up and their price came down. Piracy went through the roof, so game companies lowered their prices dramatically.
The game companies could not very well sue Hewlett Packard et. al. for producing CD Burners, so they had to yield to market pressures and cut the prices back to something more reasonable. The RIAA can sue like hell to try and kill the MP3 format (much like they did with DAT via other methods). They went to town on Diamond over the Rio player and lost, they went to town on Napster and finally won.
I would be very interested to see some statistics regarding music sales as compared to the availability of CD Burners. Those things probably had at least as much, if not more, to do with bootleg copies of music than MP3s did.
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
GG RIAA
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 2 replies.
http://www.napigator.com/
Thanks!
Your friends @
The Music Industry
Thread Truncated. Click to see all 4 replies.